>"Raymond: That's why the OSD doesn't depend on making any such > distinction -- it's too easy to end up with either exploitable > loopholes for non-cooperating commercial entities or nasty > legal risks for nonprofits."
Good grief, no. That is NOT why the open source movement doesn't make a distinction between commercial and non-commercial. The open source movement doesn't make such a distinction because such a distinction isn't "Free as in Speech" (Libre).
A non-commercial license isn't about community freedom, it's about the original author leveraging free samples in exchange for free advertising.
Graduated from Penn Hills High School, 1977. Ohio University, 1982. Spent time in grad school at Baylor University. My grades 9 and 10 were at St. Fedelis HS Seminary, now closed.
1 comment:
>"Raymond: That's why the OSD doesn't depend on making any such
> distinction -- it's too easy to end up with either exploitable
> loopholes for non-cooperating commercial entities or nasty
> legal risks for nonprofits."
Good grief, no. That is NOT why the open source movement
doesn't make a distinction between commercial and non-commercial.
The open source movement doesn't make such a distinction
because such a distinction isn't "Free as in Speech" (Libre).
A non-commercial license isn't about community freedom,
it's about the original author leveraging free samples
in exchange for free advertising.
Post a Comment